Blog Archive

Showing posts with label asteoid pair. Show all posts
Showing posts with label asteoid pair. Show all posts

Sunday, October 15, 2017

470785 (2008 UX299) vs 233771 (2008 TO124)

These two main belt asteroids have similar obit parameters.
Their orbit condition codes are 1 and 0 respectively

Using the JPL Small-Body Database Browser, we can see:

470785 (2008 UX299)

Classification: Main-belt Asteroid          SPK-ID: 2470785
Ephemeris | Orbit Diagram | Orbital Elements | Physical Parameters | Discovery Circumstances ]

[ show orbit diagram ]
Orbital Elements at Epoch 2458000.5 (2017-Sep-04.0) TDB
Reference: JPL 8 (heliocentric ecliptic J2000)
 Element Value Uncertainty (1-sigma)   Units 
e .1009684932114735 2.8551e-07  
a 2.689930801283626 1.8626e-07 au
q 2.418332541434887 9.1801e-07 au
i 3.214698487892873 1.5513e-05 deg
node 305.753597645791 0.00017107 deg
peri 87.42148259454721 0.00027647 deg
M 13.75396504670777 0.00023418 deg
tp 2457938.934770288169
(2017-Jul-04.43477029)
0.0010426 JED
period 1611.42496879941
4.41
0.00016737
4.582e-07
d
yr
n .2234047547793786 2.3204e-08 deg/d
Q 2.961529061132366 2.0506e-07 au
  Orbit Determination Parameters
   # obs. used (total)      45  
   data-arc span      4277 days (11.71 yr)  
   first obs. used      2004-12-15  
   last obs. used      2016-08-31  
   planetary ephem.      DE431  
   SB-pert. ephem.      SB431-N16  
   condition code      1  
   fit RMS      .58441  
   data source      ORB  
   producer      Otto Matic  
   solution date      2017-Apr-09 07:28:47  

Additional Information
 Earth MOID = 1.42674 au 
 Jupiter MOID = 2.43518 au 
 T_jup = 3.363 

233771 (2008 TO124)

Classification: Main-belt Asteroid          SPK-ID: 2233771
Ephemeris | Orbit Diagram | Orbital Elements | Physical Parameters | Discovery Circumstances | Close-Approach Data ]

[ show orbit diagram ]
Orbital Elements at Epoch 2458000.5 (2017-Sep-04.0) TDB
Reference: JPL 8 (heliocentric ecliptic J2000)
 Element Value Uncertainty (1-sigma)   Units 
e .1009140923237167 8.811e-08  
a 2.690005559689887 3.9217e-08 au
q 2.41854609028803 2.3857e-07 au
i 3.214945766069064 1.0959e-05 deg
node 305.7617498385058 0.00017798 deg
peri 87.60982730687554 0.0001892 deg
M 353.2000614611609 6.4573e-05 deg
tp 2458030.939020972455
(2017-Oct-04.43902097)
0.00028938 JED
period 1611.492146214952
4.41
3.5241e-05
9.648e-08
d
yr
n .2233954418242512 4.8853e-09 deg/d
Q 2.961465029091743 4.3175e-08 au
  Orbit Determination Parameters
   # obs. used (total)      112  
   data-arc span      7084 days (19.39 yr)  
   first obs. used      1995-11-18  
   last obs. used      2015-04-11  
   planetary ephem.      DE431  
   SB-pert. ephem.      SB431-N16  
   condition code      0  
   fit RMS      .60277  
   data source      ORB  
   producer      Otto Matic  
   solution date      2017-Apr-10 21:12:24  

Additional Information
 Earth MOID = 1.42701 au 
 Jupiter MOID = 2.43425 au 
 T_jup = 3.363 


I tried to simulate their behavior in the past to investigate whether they might be related.

Simulation set-up
Mercury6 Integrator

reference:
J.E.Chambers (1999) 
A Hybrid Symplectic Integrator that Permits Close Encounters between Massive Bodies''. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol 304, pp793-799.

           Integration parameters
           ----------------------

   Algorithm: Bulirsch-Stoer (conservative systems)

   Integration start epoch:         2458000.5000000 days
   Integration stop  epoch:      -100000000.0000000
   Output interval:                     100.000
   Output precision:                 medium

   Initial timestep:                0.050 days
   Accuracy parameter:              1.0000E-12
   Central mass:                    1.0000E+00 solar masses
   J_2:                              0.0000E+00
   J_4:                              0.0000E+00
   J_6:                              0.0000E+00
   Ejection distance:               1.0000E+02 AU
   Radius of central body:          5.0000E-03 AU


In order to perform the simulation I generated 30 clones for each asteroids (same average orbital parameters as the nominal ones and standard deviation almost about the one calculated by JPL).

Thus, I evaluated 900 couples to check whether there was a moment in the past when two clones were very near with a very low relative velocity.
In particular, I used two arbitrary thresholds to detect interesting couples:
  • distance less than 1 Lunar Distance - about 0.0020 AU
  • relative velocity less than 1 m/s

The clone generation and the couples evaluation have been done using scripts written in R.

Simulation Results
The results are interesting because 819 out of 900 couples satisfy the thresholds mentioned above.

Distance between clones (km):
   Min. 1st Qu.  Median    Mean 3rd Qu.    Max.   sd
    105    1200    2190    3270    3230  119000  9030

Relative velocity (m/s) when at minimum distance:
   Min. 1st Qu.  Median    Mean 3rd Qu.    Max.   sd
  0.034   0.092   0.120   0.140   0.150   0.940  0.09

Time of minimum distance (Years):
   Min. 1st Qu.  Median    Mean 3rd Qu.    Max.   sd
-272820  -75850  -62761  -74560  -56070  -18177  41444


In a graphical form:

same as above but with a little more  "zoom" ...:



The couple that went very near
Note that the time step is 100 days (this is consistent with a physical separation):



Conclusion
While this does not prove that the asteroids originated from a common body,  it seems that this is certainly a possibility.

Kind Regards,
Alessandro Odasso

Wednesday, December 9, 2015

(111298) = 2001 XZ55 versus 2008 YL20

See an update about this case received on Dec 10th: look at this MPML msg.



===============================================
I am looking again at these two asteroids.

A couple of years ago, as clearly explained by Bill Gray (see MPML msg ), it was a bit too early to make meaningful simulations trying to go back in the past as far as about 25000 years ago.

Now the orbit uncertaintly of asteroid 2008 YL20 has improved from +/- 1.62e-6 degrees /day to +/-1.1568e-08 degrees/day.

I tried a new simulation to investigate the possibility that these two asteroids separated in the past and I got a new result consisting in a nominal distance of about 4000 km, relative velocity about 15 cm/s. This event occurred about 34000 years ago.

The uncertainty is 1.1568e-08 * 365 * 34000 = 0.14 degrees that at an average distance of 2.39 AU corresponds to an uncertainty of about 0.0057 AU (i.e. three time the moon-earth distance).

So ... on one side no proof that these asteroids separated but it seems to me that this pair is still interesting.

More details looking the JPL Small Body Data:

(111298) = 2001 XZ55
Orbital Elements at Epoch 2457200.5 (2015-Jun-27.0) TDB
Reference: JPL 11 (heliocentric ecliptic J2000)

 Element Value Uncertainty (1-sigma)   Units 
e .1837905901861221 6.7074e-08
a 2.391320808768463 2.2177e-08 AU
q 1.951818546000553 1.6999e-07 AU
i 3.192061836722895 7.0356e-06 deg
node 111.491991193275 0.00011791 deg
peri 297.8338388091076 0.0001197 deg
M 257.5887075379197 2.2491e-05 deg
tp 2457584.738198736595
(2016-Jul-15.23819874)
8.7199e-05 JED
period 1350.688466278188
3.70
1.879e-05
5.144e-08
d
yr
n .2665307426456207 3.7078e-09 deg/d
Q 2.830823071536374 2.6253e-08 AU


2008 YL20
Orbital Elements at Epoch 2457200.5 (2015-Jun-27.0) TDB
Reference: JPL 8 (heliocentric ecliptic J2000)

 Element Value Uncertainty (1-sigma)   Units 
e .1837937583380851 5.5869e-07
a 2.391150352530784 6.9177e-08 AU
q 1.951671842487714 1.3831e-06 AU
i 3.193600462494826 1.3927e-05 deg
node 111.4717983197325 0.00025271 deg
peri 298.0606134273407 0.00030036 deg
M 320.5524746963916 0.00012064 deg
tp 2457348.487835047940
(2015-Nov-21.98783505)
0.00045708 JED
period 1350.544050792078
3.70
5.8608e-05
1.605e-07
d
yr
n .2665592431352864 1.1568e-08 deg/d
Q 2.830628862573854 8.1891e-08 AU


Mercury Simulator Results

Simulation parameters:

 algorithm (MVS, BS, BS2, RADAU, HYBRID etc) = bs2
 start time (days)= 2457387.5
 stop time (days) = -17.3d6
 output interval (days) = 20
 timestep (days) = 0.1
 accuracy parameter=1.d-12

The result shown as a graph (done with R package):




Kind Regards,
Alessandro Odasso



      Mercury Simulator - Mercury6
      J.E.Chambers (1999) ``A Hybrid
      Symplectic Integrator that Permits Close Encounters between
      Massive Bodies''. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical
      Society, vol 304, pp793-799.