Following this message from Adrian Coffinet, I tried a backward simulation based on the current nominal orbital parameters.
The result seems to confirm that these two Hungarians might have a common origin:
Following this message from Adrian Coffinet, I tried a backward simulation based on the current nominal orbital parameters.
The result seems to confirm that these two Hungarians might have a common origin:
These two asteroids share a very similar orbit and they have a very similar absolute magnitude and size (assuming 10% albedo, their size is 1102 and 1180 meters respectively)
Orbital elements: 2015 EN80 Perihelion 2021 Jun 24.35763 +/- 0.00111 TT = 8:34:58 (JD 2459389.85763) Epoch 2022 Mar 23.0 TT = JDT 2459661.5 Auto-Find M 66.70829243 +/- 0.00027 (J2000 ecliptic) n 0.24557395 +/- 5.89e-9 Peri. 282.14566 +/- 0.00019 a 2.52550274 +/- 4.04e-8 Node 98.81297 +/- 0.00006 e 0.1644376 +/- 1.73e-6 Incl. 16.06226 +/- 0.000033 P 4.01 H 17.9 G 0.15 U 0.8 q 2.11021511 +/- 4.37e-6 Q 2.94079038 +/- 4.35e-6 From 46 observations 2005 Dec. 24-2022 Mar. 23; mean residual 0".33
Orbital elements: 2017 XP90 Perihelion 2021 Jun 26.30182 +/- 0.00152 TT = 7:14:37 (JD 2459391.80182) Epoch 2022 Jan 6.0 TT = JDT 2459585.5 Auto-Find M 47.57079914 +/- 0.00037 (J2000 ecliptic) n 0.24559239 +/- 6.59e-9 Peri. 282.12973 +/- 0.00025 a 2.52537634 +/- 4.52e-8 Node 98.81216 +/- 0.000059 e 0.1644239 +/- 2.44e-6 Incl. 16.06218 +/- 0.000028 P 4.01 H 17.8 G 0.15 U 0.9 q 2.11014391 +/- 6.17e-6 Q 2.94060878 +/- 6.12e-6 From 45 observations 2006 Jan. 23-2022 Jan. 6; mean residual 0".21
Based on the nominal parameters, they might have a potential common origin:
Its orbit has a Jupiter moid = 0.0060 AU
I generated 100 clones of 2021 CC40 in the last 10^8 days (i.e. from now back to about 280K years ago).
75 clones came into the solar system from a distance greater than 100 AU
From this point of view, it seems that 2021 CC40 is a good candidate for having a cometary origin.
More details here:
Clones Generation
Clones | Target | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
mean | sd | mean | sd | ||
q | 3.25399802390041 | 7.03707449970568e-05 | 3.25400084057019 | 7.0403e-05 | |
e | 0.241134331789963 | 1.59398555200895e-05 | 0.241133698559336 | 1.5947e-05 | |
i | 12.9796232392302 | 6.18646863798976e-05 | 12.9796210051976 | 6.1886e-05 | |
peri | 328.501490543462 | 0.00855370237432572 | 328.501160286746 | 0.008554 | |
node | 235.614402285421 | 0.000361242956610133 | 235.61440679467 | 0.00036124 | |
tp | 2459672.09000109 | 0.0444299088063099 | 2459672.08824673 | 0.044429 |
Mercury6 Simulation
)O+_06 Integration parameters (WARNING: Do not delete this line!!) ) Lines beginning with `)' are ignored. )--------------------------------------------------------------------- ) Important integration parameters: )--------------------------------------------------------------------- algorithm (MVS, BS, BS2, RADAU, HYBRID etc) = BS start time (days)= 2459671.5 ) stop time (days) = 102458000.5 stop time (days) = -1d8 output interval (days) = 100 timestep (days) = 0.05 accuracy parameter=1.d-12
...
ejection distance (AU)= 100
Results
In the following plots, time is displayed on the vertical axis in order to have more space. The simulation time has been divided into 50 slots and for every slot the relevant orbital parameter distribution (inter-quartile) of all existing clones is shown.See thread initiated by Marco di Lorenzo about these two objects.
On March 31th / April 1st, these two asteroids had a close encounter with Earth (about 0.00034 AU).
Here you can see a few graphs showing the variation of their orbital parameters:
These two asteroids might have a common origin:
As noticed by Adrien Coffinet (see MPML message), the above plot is based on the nominal parameters but there is a high uncertainty regarding 2015 VZ9.
We have to wait for more observations.
In the meantime, in order to better characterize this aspect, I generated 100 clones of 2015 VZ9 and I plotted the min relative velocity (and related distance).
Disregarding a couple of extreme outliers, I got this plot:
This shows the spread, while not all clones are interesting, there are about 30% of the clones that have relative velocity less than 1 m/s and a distance less than 1 LD.
Cheers,
Alessandro Odasso
Clones generation
Clones | Target | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
mean | sd | mean | sd | ||
q | 3.85914782817777 | 2.37290442662423e-07 | 3.85914783140272 | 2.3537e-07 | |
e | 0.0801406801559403 | 6.09227507904535e-08 | 0.0801406839559804 | 6.2114e-08 | |
i | 17.137419366797 | 6.36351406517114e-06 | 17.137419930196 | 6.2706e-06 | |
peri | 320.523142499568 | 5.99473078348146e-05 | 320.523140865999 | 5.9474e-05 | |
node | 307.443365230246 | 2.42363482614464e-05 | 307.443369025924 | 2.384e-05 | |
tp | 2460899.33667196 | 0.000556445464595854 | 2460899.33668632 | 0.0005656 |
100 clones were generated to match the nominal orbital parameters (and uncertainty) of asteroid 2009 PZ21 (orbit condition code 0 - last observed in Feb 2022).
Backward simulation
Mercury 6 parameters:
)O+_06 Integration parameters (WARNING: Do not delete this line!!)
) Lines beginning with `)' are ignored.
)---------------------------------------------------------------------
) Important integration parameters:
)---------------------------------------------------------------------
algorithm (MVS, BS, BS2, RADAU, HYBRID etc) = BS
start time (days)= 2459600.5
stop time (days) = -1d8
output interval (days) = 100
timestep (days) = 0.05
accuracy parameter=1.d-12
...
ejection distance (AU)= 100
Simulation results
Plots
In the following plots, the simulation time has been divided into 50 slots and the relevant orbital inter-quartile distribution of the contributing clones is shown:
Best wishes,
Alessandro Odasso